One of the most important things you must decide when beginning your novel or short story is deciding which character or characters you are going to view the story through. I call it deciding on which pair or pairs of eyes you want to see the story with. There are basically three types of viewpoints (it can get more complex) in fiction writing: the omniscient viewpoint, single character viewpoint, and dual or multicharacter viewpoint.
With the
omniscient viewpoint, the author writes from the perspective of the removed
observer. This viewpoint allows the
author to get into all the characters’ heads at once. This viewpoint is the least engaging and
should be used sparingly. I will write
more about viewpoint in future blogs.
For now here is an example of the omniscient viewpoint from Gary
Colvin’s novel, The Last Fisherman:
The Whalehead
trolling drag lay only thirty yards outside the shoreline. It allowed Jim and Sammy to view an
intriguing rocky beach and dense forest all day long. A family of Bald Eagles on the island also added
their daily activities to the enjoyment of the two fishermen. One moment the big birds sat majestically on
a perch, and the next moment they soared gracefully through the air with
extended talons to catch fish.
While the
observation of nature in action brought pleasure to the fishermen, the trolling
drag also produced good catches of salmon.
When Laurs appeared on the scene the first week in August, the crew on
the Miss Laura knew they had chosen
the right spot.
In this
passage we find that we are viewing the story through the eyes of a distant
narrator who seems to know what is going on inside the heads of both characters
and tells us. We know that both
fishermen enjoyed the Bald Eagles and that they knew that they had chosen the
right spot.
On the other
hand, single character viewpoint simply means that you are viewing the story
through the eyes of one particular character, usually the protagonist. Here is an example from the novel Try Darkness by James Scott Bell:
I stopped off
at the Ultimate Sip. Pick McNitt made me
what he called a Darwinian. “If you can survive this, you’re one of the
fittest.”
It was like
all the espresso beans in Los Angeles in a single cup.
“Wow,” I
said.
“Exactly,”
McNitt said. His big moon face was
beaming under his snowy beard. “You think it’ll sell?”
“Oh yeah,”
What’re you going to charge?”
“Five bucks.”
“A little
high, isn’t it?”
“All the
writers will buy it. I’ll tell ‘em they can be the next Balzac.”
“Balzac?”
“You know
Balzac. Guy drank about forty cups of black coffee a day. Had his servants wake
him up at midnight, got to his writing table, and wrote until exhausted. Then
he’d start with coffee and keep going.
Wrote a hundred books that way. Before the age of fifty-one.”
“What
happened when he turned fifty-one?”
“Died”
“How?”
“Caffeine
poisoning.”
“Ah.” I took one more sip and started to feel like
I could jump over the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.
Notice that
Bell never lets us know what McNitt is thinking or observing, only what he
says. We are not allowed into McNitt’s
mind because he is not the viewpoint character, Ty the protagonist is. It is through Ty’s eyes that we see McNitt’s
moon face and snowy beard and know how Ty feels after his last sip of coffee.
Deciding
upon whose eyes you want your reader to see your story through should be done
before you begin writing to save you a few headaches. Of course, there is always room for a change
of mind throughout the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment